Crematorium worker sacked for mixing ashes of people’s pets in oven

Crematorium worker Jack Hamilton was sacked for mixing ashes of people's pets
Jack Hamilton risked inflicting ‘catastrophic’ reputational injury for Grimsby Crematorium (Image: Google)

A crematorium employee was sacked after mixing the stays of useless pets and dropping them on the ground, an employment tribunal heard.

Jack Hamilton ‘purposefully’ pushed ashes to the again of the cremator to cover the actual fact they have been nonetheless inside, which ‘undoubtedly’ led to contamination.

The tribunal heard such a mix-up would result in ‘catastrophic’ reputational injury for the council-run Grimsby Crematorium, in Lincolnshire, which might have misplaced its licence.

After being sacked for gross misconduct, Mr Hamilton took North East Lincolnshire Council to the tribunal for ‘unfair dismissal’.

However his claims have been unsuccessful, with the panel concluding they have been ‘solely glad’ together with his sacking.

Mr Hamilton, who beforehand labored in hospitality, started working as a crematorium technician in October 2019.

After supervising the cremation of 100 human our bodies, Mr Hamilton was issued with a qualification in April 2020.

Two months later, the council began cremating pets, which was ‘not materially totally different’ from human cremations, the tribunal heard.

The ‘de-ashing’ course of was essential for avoiding cross-contamination, assuring grieving customers they have been solely amassing the stays of their family members.

On December 22, 2021, Mr Hamilton’s boss was loading an animal into the cremator when it turned clear the stays of a distinct pet have been nonetheless inside.

The panel heard Mr Hamilton had intentionally pushed the stays to the again of the cremator to ‘conceal’ them.

He was suspended after it was additionally discovered the paperwork for 3 earlier cremations had not been accomplished.

At a disciplinary listening to in February, Mr Hamilton was dismissed with one month’s discover for ‘gross misconduct’ – a call he didn’t attraction.

The tribunal judgement stated: ‘We're solely glad within the circumstances that dismissal was inside the band of cheap responses.’

.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post