Novak Djokovic has been freed after the Australian authorities determined to not revoke his visa on Monday night, whereas supporters of tennis’ world No.1 clashed with police in ugly scenes on the streets of Melbourne.

The 34-year-old, who's unvaccinated and claimed he was given a medical exemption which permits him to compete within the Australian Open this month, received his enchantment because the federal court docket overturned the federal government’s resolution to cancel his visa.

However Djokovic has been warned that Australia’s immigration minister, Alex Hawke, nonetheless has the ‘private energy’ to revoke the visa, despite the fact that he didn't take that call after the court docket’s ruling.

There is no such thing as a time restrict on Hawke’s energy to cancel Djokovic’s visa, and the choice might be made on grounds of ‘public curiosity’ earlier than the Australian Open begins on January 17.

A spokesperson for Hawke mentioned on Monday night: ‘Following at the moment’s Federal Courtroom dedication on a procedural floor, it stays inside Immigration Minister Hawke’s discretion to contemplate cancelling Mr Djokovic’s visa beneath his private energy of cancellation inside part 133C(3) of the Migration Act.

‘The Minister is at the moment contemplating the matter and the method stays ongoing.’

A car believed to contain Novak Djokovic was mobbed by supporters
A automotive believed to include Novak Djokovic was mobbed by supporters (Reuters)
Melbourne police used pepper spray to disperse supporters on the streets
Melbourne police used pepper spray to disperse supporters on the streets (AP)

After being transported from the court docket to his lawyer’s workplace in Melbourne, Djokovic was then taken away to a personal location.

Nonetheless, some supporters turned agitated with police, who used pepper spray to disperse the massive crowds.

There was additionally confusion following the court docket ruling as Serbian media claimed that Djokovic’s father, Srdan, had mentioned that his son had been re-arrested.

Nonetheless, it’s understood that the police presence outdoors the workplace of Djokovic’s legal professionals in Melbourne was there as a result of quantity of supporters on the streets.

Novak Djokovic's fans marched along the streets in Melbourne
Novak Djokovic’s followers marched alongside the streets in Melbourne (Getty)

‘We're at the moment consulting with legal professionals on the following steps,’ Djordje Djokovic, Novak’s brother, instructed TV Prva on Monday.

‘Novak is now together with his legal professionals within the premises the place they have been through the court docket appointment, fascinated by his choices. I believe this was an enormous defeat for the authorities, they misplaced, they usually thought they might win towards the entire system and Novak.

‘Novak has been by means of a whirlwind of feelings, he's in an excellent temper now, however he should be calm and sensible.’

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JANUARY 06: Supporters gather outside Park Hotel where Novak Djokovic was taken pending his removal from the country after his visa was cancelled by the Australian Border Force in Melbourne, Australia on January 06, 2022. Djokovic arrived in Melbourne to play in the upcoming Australian Open and was denied entry to Australia as border authorities cancelled his visa. (Photo by Recep Sakar/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Novak Djokovic had been detained in a detention resort since Wednesday (Getty)

Djokovic, who's aiming to win the Australian Open for the tenth time in his profession, had been detained in a detention resort in Melbourne since final Wednesday.

The Serb’s mom, Dijana, described the situations as ‘inhumane’ and claimed her son was not even receiving three meals a day.

‘They locked him up, they don’t even give him breakfast, he has lunch and dinner, there's nothing for breakfast,’ Dijana Djokovic mentioned on Sunday night.

‘I’m telling you what he instructed me. And in jail they've three meals a day and to exit.

‘There is no such thing as a regular window to take a look at the park however a wall. These will not be humane situations.’

.

.