Kim Bodnia and Henry Cavill in The Witcher
Geralt is reunited with his mentor and father figure Vesemir (Picture: Netflix/Jay Maidment)

A fan theory for The Witcher season 3 has speculated on the possible fate of a major character who has seemingly been killed off… but perhaps could have another lease of life.

In the second season of the Netflix fantasy series, Geralt of Rivia (Henry Cavill) returns to Kaer Morhen, where he grew up and was trained to become a monster hunter, with his young charge, Princess Ciri (Freya Allan).

When he arrives, he is reunited with his mentor Vesemir (Kim Bodnia) in addition to several other witchers, including his close friend Eskel (Basil Eidenbenz).

Eskel becomes infected by a Leshen, a forest monster with a lethal appetite that takes the form of a tree.

He ends up transforming into a Leshy mutant himself, forcing Geralt and Vesemir to fight him and ultimately bring him down, resulting in his untimely death.

Basil Eidenbenz as Eskel in The Witcher
Eskel meets a measly demise… if that’s really him (Picture: Netflix/Jay Maidment)

There is major upset among some fans concerning the depiction of Eskel’s demise, in addition to backlash over the difference between his character’s personality and his portrayal in the books and video games.

One fan shared a theory on Reddit speculating that the reason why something seemed to be off about the witcher was because he wasn’t actually Eskel, but an impersonator.

Going by the handle u/Kilimanjaro90, they wrote: ‘Eskel that died is a doppler,’ dopplers being shapeshifters who can take the form of any creature they’ve encountered in The Witcher universe.

The Reddit user explained that some of the things that Eskel said hinted that he may not be the real one, as he appeared to forget ‘common witcher knowledge’.

The Witcher
The band of brothers get ready to fight (Picture: Netflix)

Speaking about Eskel’s initial battle with the Lesher, the fan said: ‘First time he came and said he fought for six hours and Vesemir said why didn’t you just put a flame through its heart or something which sounds like common witcher knowledge but he doesn’t know [because] he is not witcher.’

They added that on a second occasion, when he tried to ‘punch Geralt, he missed terribly’.

‘We know Geralt is Geralt and Eskel had few drinks but he is another witcher and should at least stick a hit,’ they affirmed, concluding: ‘Hopefully turns out a doppler was involved and real Eskel casually walks in a dramatic scene or after a big fight.’

While this theory would make for a fascinating twist, and could please fans who aren’t happy with the character’s traits in the show, not everyone is convinced.

One Reddit user questioned what the relevance would be in bringing Eskel back, stating: ‘I see the hope but why would they do such a thing? What does Eskel not being dead add to the story? What role does Eskel have in the future events?’

They continued: ‘They just killed him off for dramatic reasons and even though I also would’ve preferred an unnamed witcher to be killed in his stead, let’s face it, what is done is done.’

Another commented wistfully: ‘I like your way of thinking…..if only.’

While in the Netflix show, Eskel seems quite uncouth, fans of the character said that he has previously been depicted as a more caring individual who is ‘kind-hearted’.

‘Why? Why would you do this to a character the entire fandom loves already and was gonna welcome with open arms? Do you have any idea what Eskel means to a lot of us? I just cannot wrap my head around how anyone could think the fans would took this well,’ one person tweeted.

‘I was SO excited for Season 2. But they hurt me right out of the gate with this Eskel nonsense. What a great way to ruin a darling, good hearted character. Thanks for ruining my excitement,’ another viewer remarked.