Regardless of a Soviet-style clampdown, we may help the exiles who're preserving unbiased journalism for Russians again residence
- Mark Rice-Oxley is a former Moscow correspondent
Battlefield tanks are actually solely half the battle. Past army would possibly on the bottom in Ukraine, there may be one other important confrontation through which the Kremlin has a superiority that have to be challenged. The knowledge struggle.
Russia’s media house has reverted to a grotesque parody of the Soviet-era mannequin. (Actually, it’s far worse, as within the latter Soviet years at the very least, most individuals knew they have been being fed lies). Tv and the home press is completely captured. Thousands and thousands are fed a every day food regimen of Ukrainian “fascists”, western pederasts, and nuclear revenge on Anglo-Saxon civilisation.
It’s working. A broad consensus inside Russia nonetheless helps Putin and his wretched marketing campaign in Ukraine. The Kremlin could also be making a hash of the struggle on the bottom, however it's successful the propaganda battle.
There may be, nonetheless, a tiny minority of brave journalists who're making an attempt to make a distinction, publishing unbiased, credible information for audiences again at residence. It isn’t straightforward. They've been blocked, banned, bullied and banished from Russia. They've been condemned as overseas brokers and “undesirables”, and their journalists, funders and readers have been threatened. They sit in exile, in need of employees, advertisers and income. However not in need of readers.

Unbiased information web sites comparable to Meduza and Holod say they nonetheless attain tens of millions of distinctive browsers in Russia, because of mirror web sites, digital personal networks (VPNs) that may dodge the censors, and hard-to-block channels like e mail and Telegram.
I visited senior editors from each in Riga final week as a part of a Guardian Basis undertaking to match notes and supply recommendation on how one can fund unbiased journalism. Meduza’s editor-in-chief, Galina Timchenko, informed me it was like a recreation of cat and mouse: every time she got here up with a brand new method of distributing information in Russia, the authorities shut it down. And but Meduza nonetheless claimed about 2.5 million distinctive browsers month-to-month in Russia final yr.
Holod’s editor, Taisia Bekbulatova, stated shoring up unbiased Russian journalism was an important a part of saving Russia from itself.
“Our objective is to protect unbiased journalism for the way forward for Russia,” Bekbulatova informed me. “Regardless of having to work in exile, we consider within the significance of high-quality journalism and the opportunity of destroying a dictatorship. We need to be not only a media, however a real establishment of unbiased journalism.”
For a western world agonising over how one can make a distinction within the Ukraine struggle, supporting journalists like this appears an apparent alternative. In the identical method that tens of millions of readers have supported Guardian journalism over time as a result of they recognise the significance of unbiased media to the functioning of democracy, the identical obtains in Russia.
We may help outfits like Meduza and Holod simply, for the fraction of the price of a Leopard tank. The hope must be that flourishing unbiased Russian information organisations would possibly persuade ever larger numbers to query the Kremlin’s lies. Glasnost has impeccable kind on this regard.
Mark Rice-Oxley is the Guardian’s govt editor for supporters and a former Moscow correspondent
You will discover out extra right here about supporting Holod and Meduza
Post a Comment